No Democracy in America
Uploaded by: mrgrieves9876
Video Description:
This is a clip from the film AN UNREASONABLE MAN
======================================== ===
From answers.com:
"Though the commission [on Presidential Debates] is meant to sound like a official government arm, it is actually a private entity, funded entirely by corporate contributions from companies like AT &T, IBM, Philip Morris, and others."
To this day, even after shutting out Ralph Nader, the COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTAL DEBATES is still rigged by former Republicans and former Democrats. ======================================== === The following mission statement is from the COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES' own website. Take note o
f the LIE in the last sentence where they insist that they sponsored "ALL" candidates! ======================================== == "The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible in
formation to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan corporation,
sponsored all the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004." ======================================== === WHY AREN'T THE MAJOR NEWS MEDIA NETWORKS RUNNING THESE DEBATES. WHY IS A PRIVATE CORPORATION RUN BY DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS RUNNING THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES? HOW CAN THE DEB
ATES BE TRUSTED IF THEY ARE RIGGED BY THE TWO LEADING PARTIES WHICH ARE MERELY TWO SIDES OF THE SAME WORTHLESS COIN? WHY ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ALLOWING THIS SHAM TO CONTINUE? IT IS IN THEIR OWN SELF INTEREST FOR THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES NOT TO ALLOW THIRD-PARTY CANDIDATES TO PARTIC
IPATE IN PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES. THE DEMOCRATS AND THE REPUBLICANS HAVE AN UNLAWFUL MONOPOLY ON WHO MAY OR MAY NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE US PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES. ======================================== === Read the CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS on the COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES own website: http
://www.debates.org/pages/candsel2... ==========+===FROM ANSWERS.COM============= The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 by the Democratic and Republican parties to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information
to viewers and listeners. Though the commission is meant to sound like a official government arm, it is actually a private entity, funded entirely by corporate contributions from companies like AT &T, IBM, Philip Morris, and others.
The Commission sponsors and produces debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and undertakes research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, bi-partisan corporation, sponsored each of the presidential debates h
eld since 1988. The Commission has moderated the 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004 debates. Prior to this, the League of Women Voters moderated the 1976, 1980, 1984 debates. During the 2000 election, the CPD stipulated that that candidates would only be invited to debate if they had a 15 percent supp
ort level across five national polls. Ralph Nader believed that the regulation was created to stifle the views of third party candidates by keeping them off the televised debates. Nader brought a lawsuit against them in a federal court, on that basis that corporate contributions violate the Federal
Election Campaign Act
Tags for this video: campaign debate forum fox nader paul president ralph ron
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by mrgrieves9876
| Ralph Nader Debate Protest | Ron Paul Denied by Fox News | Hacking Democracy 1 of 9 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Ralph Nader - An Unreasonable Man | Ralph Nader Interview | Ralph Nader speaks about the Israeli/Lebanon conflict |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














Matt Gonzalez as Vice President! go to votenader-dot-o r g
McCain voted YES to The Patriot Act!
The Patriot Act gives the Government the power 2 tap Americans phones,break into their homes,Put you in Prison without a warrant or any charges,Monitor your movements,Medical Records,LABEL you a terrorist with no proof,just because you speak out against the system!Please,this is 2 important to just vote based on celebrity!heck out their voting records first!Don't do this to our country or your children!
Constitution Party Candidate: Chuck Baldwin Democratic Party Candidate: Barack Obama Green Party Candidate: Cynthia McKinney Independent Party Candidate: Ralph Nader Libertarian Party Candidate: Bob Barr Republican Party Candidate: John McCain Thanks!
then click the "Issues" tab to find out what Ralph Nader would do for the working class citizens of America! vote 4 real change, not chump change vote for your childrens future!
But RALPH NADER stood with the majority of Americans AGAINST the BAILOUT!
So, on November 4th let you voices be heard loud and clear at the polls...
VOTE NADER/Gonzalez !
Senators, you voted for the $700 billion bailout. Can you tell us why?
If you favor the bail out package how come we don't hear you publically discussing its merits and virtues?
We only hear about it from Paulson
Have we abdicated our goverment to the secretary of treasury, Paulson, who just a couple of years ago was an ardent capitalist at Goldman Sachs, cashed out and now is the US's largest proponent of socialism?
Also, in my opinion, the deliberate oppression of third parties by the Democrats and Republicans is plenty of reason not to vote for either of those two (or is that one?) dominant parties for as long as they continue this oppression; and of course they'll continue it because it's in their own inte
rest.